Every SaaS founder has the same inbox problem: feature requests scattered across email, Slack, Intercom, and Twitter DMs. Some get tracked in spreadsheets. Most get forgotten. Then customers churn and say "you never listen to feedback."
Canny built a $500K+ ARR business solving exactly this — a public board where users submit ideas, upvote, and see your roadmap. Then they raised prices to $400/month. Overnight, thousands of small SaaS teams got priced out.
The Canny revolt created a clear opportunity. UserJot and Fider are building in public as alternatives, but neither has nailed the UX. There's room for a beautifully designed feedback board at 1/4 of Canny's price that does the core job perfectly: collect, prioritize, and communicate.
💰 Revenue Blueprint
Three-tier value ladder to monetize from day one
One feedback board with voting. Up to 50 posts. Public roadmap included. Perfect for validating demand.
Unlimited posts, custom domain, SSO, email notifications, Slack integration. White-label available.
Multiple boards, team roles, API access, custom workflows, priority support. Built for growing SaaS teams.
Why Now?
Canny's aggressive pricing hike ($400/mo) left thousands of small SaaS teams looking for alternatives. The 'anti-Canny' narrative is strong on Twitter and Indie Hackers. Meanwhile, every SaaS needs user feedback — it's table stakes. Perfect timing to capture frustrated Canny users.
📊 Market Evidence
The Market Gap
Canny ($400/mo) priced out small teams. Fider is open-source but requires self-hosting. UserVoice is enterprise-only. Nobody owns the $29-79/mo segment for SaaS teams with 100-10K users. The gap: beautiful UX + affordable pricing + zero friction setup.
Revenue Examples
Public company data
🏆 Competitor Landscape
How existing players stack up in this market
| Competitor | Pricing | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Canny | $400/mo | Market leader, expensive |
| Nolt | $25/mo | Simpler alternative |
| UserJot | $29/mo | Indie, building in public |
Market leader, expensive
Simpler alternative
Indie, building in public
Launch Strategy
Build a one-click Canny importer. Launch with 'switching from Canny?' landing page targeting searchers. Post comparison content on Indie Hackers and r/SaaS. Offer free migration assistance. Target the #buildinpublic community — they all need feedback tools and love supporting bootstrapped alternatives.
🛠️ Recommended Tech Stack
Suggested tools and technologies to build this idea
Why this stack: Supabase real-time powers live vote counts. Row Level Security keeps feedback per-org. An embeddable iframe widget lets teams add it to any app.
Strengths
- ✓Every SaaS needs this
- ✓Canny pricing jumped massively - clear wedge
- ✓1-2 week build
Risks
- ⚠Feature creep pressure
- ⚠Need to stay focused on core
Score Breakdown
High demand, proven revenue, low competition — a strong opportunity
Market (20%) + Revenue (20%) + Trend (15%) + Competition (15%) + Build (15%) + Pricing (15%)
Canny, Nolt, Fider all paid; Canny raising prices
Canny $500k+, indie alternatives viable
Steady; every SaaS needs user feedback
Canny expensive ($400/mo), room for $29-99/mo option
1-2 weeks with standard stack
$29-99/mo validated
🚀 Start Building
Copy a prompt into your favorite AI coding tool and start building this idea right now.
Build a SaaS product called "User Feedback & Feature Voting Board". ## Product Overview Public feedback board where users submit ideas, upvote, and see your roadmap. ## Problem SaaS teams need user feedback but Canny charges $400/mo ## Solution Simple voting board + public roadmap at 1/4 the price ## Target Audience SaaS founders, product teams, indie hackers ## Tech Stack - Next.js 15 (App Router) with TypeScript - Tailwind CSS v4 for styling - Supabase for auth, database, and storage - Vercel for deployment - shadcn/ui for UI components - Framer Motion for animations ## MVP Features to Build 1. Landing page with clear value proposition 2. User authentication (sign up, sign in, forgot password) 3. Core product functionality based on the solution above 4. Dashboard for users to manage their data 5. Pricing page with at least 2 tiers (free + paid) 6. Basic settings/profile page ## Known Competitors Canny, Nolt, UserJot ## Key Risks to Address Feature creep pressure Need to stay focused on core ## Deployment 1. Set up Supabase project and configure environment variables 2. Deploy to Vercel with `npx vercel --prod` 3. Set up custom domain 4. Configure Supabase RLS policies for security ## Instructions Start by creating the project structure, then build the landing page first. Use server components where possible. Make it mobile-responsive from the start. Focus on getting the core value loop working before adding polish.