Back to all ideas
78
PromisingAdded 1w agoThu, Feb 5, 2026, 1:19 PM
Developer-FirstAnti-IncumbentQuick WinRecurring Need

Error Tracking for Small Teams

Lightweight error monitoring and crash reporting without enterprise pricing. $9-19/mo.

A solo developer ships a Next.js app on Friday evening. By Monday, 47 users have hit a TypeError that crashes the checkout flow — but he has no idea because he doesn't have error tracking. No Sentry, no Bugsnag, nothing. He finds out when a customer tweets 'your checkout is broken.' Estimated lost revenue: $2,300 over the weekend.

Sentry is the obvious choice with 90K+ GitHub stars and widespread adoption. But Sentry's pricing page requires a calculator: you pay per 'event' with a base of 50K events/month at $26/mo, but production apps can generate millions of events from a single bug. Developers regularly report surprise $200+ bills. The dashboard, while powerful, looks like an airplane cockpit.

The opportunity is the 'Linear of error tracking' — clean, fast, opinionated. Flat pricing at $9-19/mo regardless of events. Smart deduplication that groups errors intelligently so you see 5 bugs, not 5,000 events. Source map support, Slack alerts, and a dashboard you can actually understand in 10 seconds.

💰 Revenue Blueprint

Three-tier value ladder to monetize from day one

1
Lead MagnetFree Tracking
Free

1 project, 1K errors/day, 7-day retention, email alerts

2
StarterIndie
$9/mo

3 projects, unlimited errors, 30-day retention, Slack + email alerts, source maps, smart grouping

3
GrowthTeam
$19/mo

10 projects, 90-day retention, team dashboard, release tracking, user context, API, webhooks

Why Now?

JavaScript ecosystem is more complex than ever (SSR, RSC, edge functions). More surfaces for bugs. Sentry keeps raising prices. Developer experience tools (Linear, Vercel) set new UX standards.

📊 Market Evidence

The Market Gap

Sentry is powerful but complex and expensive. Bugsnag ($47/mo min) is enterprise-focused. No clean, flat-rate error tracker at $9-19/mo for small teams.

Revenue Examples

Sentry$5M+ MRR

Raised $200M+, dominant market position

Highlight.io$50K+ MRR

Open-source, growing fast

🏆 Competitor Landscape

How existing players stack up in this market

Sentry$26-80/mo

Market leader, 90K+ GitHub stars, event-based pricing

Bugsnag$47-249/mo

Enterprise error monitoring

Highlight.io$0-150/mo

Open-source session replay + errors

Launch Strategy

1) Open-source the client SDK for trust. 2) Launch on HN: 'I built the error tracker I wished Sentry was.' 3) Target r/webdev, r/node, r/nextjs. 4) Free tier drives adoption. 5) Comparison content: 'Sentry vs us: when you don't need an enterprise tool.'

🛠️ Recommended Tech Stack

Suggested tools and technologies to build this idea

🖥️Frontend
Next.js + Recharts
⚙️Backend
Go (event ingestion API)
🗄️Database
ClickHouse + PostgreSQL
☁️Hosting
Fly.io + Vercel
💳Payments
Stripe
🧩Other
Lightweight JS/Python/Ruby SDKs, Source map processing, Slack/Discord alerting

Why this stack: Go handles high-throughput error event ingestion. ClickHouse stores and queries large volumes of error data efficiently. Lightweight SDKs minimize client-side overhead.

Strengths

  • Every production app needs error tracking
  • Clear pricing advantage vs Sentry
  • Open-source SDK builds trust
  • Very sticky — switching error trackers is painful

Risks

  • Sentry could simplify pricing
  • Open-source alternatives (GlitchTip) are free
  • Need to handle high event ingestion volumes

Score Breakdown

78/100
Promising

Good market signals with room for growth

Market (20%) + Revenue (20%) + Trend (15%) + Competition (15%) + Build (15%) + Pricing (15%)

Market Proof8/10

Sentry raised $200M+ — massive market

Revenue Proof7/10

Multiple tools at significant MRR

Trend Momentum7/10

More complex frontends = more errors

Competition Gap6/10

Sentry dominant but overbuilt for small teams

Build Speed7/10

Moderate — ingestion pipeline is the hard part

Pricing Signal8/10

Strong willingness to pay for production monitoring

🚀 Start Building

Copy a prompt into your favorite AI coding tool and start building this idea right now.

prompt.md
Build a SaaS product called "Error Tracking for Small Teams".

## Product Overview
Lightweight error monitoring and crash reporting without enterprise pricing. $9-19/mo.

## Problem
Sentry is the gold standard for error tracking but their pricing is confusing (event-based), the dashboard is overwhelming, and you can easily hit surprise bills. Small teams need error monitoring but not Sentry's complexity.

## Solution
Clean, fast error tracker with smart grouping, source map support, and Slack/email alerts. Flat, predictable pricing instead of per-event billing. Set up in 2 minutes with one NPM package.

## Target Audience
Indie hackers, small dev teams, startup engineers who don't want enterprise tooling

## Tech Stack
- Next.js 15 (App Router) with TypeScript
- Tailwind CSS v4 for styling
- Supabase for auth, database, and storage
- Vercel for deployment
- shadcn/ui for UI components
- Framer Motion for animations

## MVP Features to Build
1. Landing page with clear value proposition
2. User authentication (sign up, sign in, forgot password)
3. Core product functionality based on the solution above
4. Dashboard for users to manage their data
5. Pricing page with at least 2 tiers (free + paid)
6. Basic settings/profile page

## Known Competitors
Sentry, Bugsnag, Highlight.io

## Key Risks to Address
Sentry could simplify pricing
Open-source alternatives (GlitchTip) are free
Need to handle high event ingestion volumes

## Deployment
1. Set up Supabase project and configure environment variables
2. Deploy to Vercel with `npx vercel --prod`
3. Set up custom domain
4. Configure Supabase RLS policies for security

## Instructions
Start by creating the project structure, then build the landing page first. Use server components where possible. Make it mobile-responsive from the start. Focus on getting the core value loop working before adding polish.